How to handle the most common client objections and close more deals with AI

Objections are something that inevitably comes up in sales and customer communication. Sometimes they catch you off guard right when you felt it was “almost done.” But it’s important to realize that an objection doesn’t mean the end. It’s more a moment when the client is thinking: “This sounds interesting… but I need to sort it out in my head.”

When you respond to an objection calmly, humanly, and with specifics, it often becomes the best part of the whole conversation—because this is where trust is built.
‍

How to work with client objections: a simple process that works

Instead of getting defensive, use this simple rhythm to keep the conversation pleasant and constructive:

1. Acknowledge: Confirm you hear the objection (“I understand—that makes sense…”).
2. Clarify: Find out what’s underneath (“What exactly concerns you in this area?”).
3. Context & value: Explain why the AI solution addresses the issue.
4. Next step: Propose a small commitment (demo, pilot, comparison).

The most common client objections—and how to respond
‍

“We don’t get enough inquiries for it to be worth it.”

Clients often think automation is only for huge corporations. In reality, it’s about efficiency and availability—not just volume. At first glance, this sounds like a clear “no.” But most of the time it’s uncertainty about whether automation makes sense at a lower volume.

It often turns out that inquiries are just fragmented—some come via email, some via chat, some through social media, some by phone. And precisely because there are fewer inquiries, every interaction matters more. It affects satisfaction, retention, and purchase decisions. Plus, a bot covers times when staffing a customer line would be really difficult. A chatbot or voicebot doesn’t sleep at night, doesn’t take vacations, and doesn’t take holidays.

Return on Investment (ROI) Calculator for End Customers
‍

“We’re building our own internal solution.”

For the client, an internal solution is often a mix of time already invested and the need to stay in control. But what exactly is that solution? Be curious and ask how much development and maintenance costs them today versus what they would pay for a ready-made solution that’s already proven and polished.

In-house development makes sense for truly unique core business capabilities. But with conversational AI, you’re paying not only for development, but also continuous maintenance, LLM tuning, and scaling. With coworkers.ai, clients get a ready-to-run, battle-tested solution they can launch in a fraction of the time and cost compared to building it with internal developers.
‍

“It’s not relevant right now.”

This objection is paradoxical at its core: clients are too busy, so they don’t have time to implement something that would save them time.

In translation, it usually means: “We don’t have the capacity, and it’s not a priority.” In this case, it helps to reduce fears about implementation complexity. If you can handle most of the work, say so. The goal is to remove routine from the client’s plate so they can focus on the priorities that are currently burning. Often, when things are hectic, it’s exactly the right time to automate routine work.
‍

“We have very specific questions—AI won’t handle that.”

The fear of “dumb chatbots” from the past still lingers. But today’s AI bots don’t work on rigid scripts. Instead, they understand context and draw from a knowledge base.

It’s important to realize the goal isn’t to handle 100% of all questions. It’s to cover the repeating portion of inquiries.
‍

Mini cheat sheet for partners: 5 questions that move the conversation forward

• “How many inquiries do you get per day across all channels?”
• “What’s the biggest issue today: speed, capacity, or response quality?”
• “How much time do routine questions take each week?”
• “Who handles implementation on your side, and how much bandwidth do they have?”
• “What would success look like in 30 days?”

‍